La Rentrée

August 24, 2007

1. “The best teacher lodges an intent not in the mind but in the heart.”
2. All that is intrinsic cannot be made extrinsic.
3. Learning is not a production line; it is not linear.
4. Learning is not teaching.
5. The student’s world is not the teacher’s world; there’s a lot of room for misunderstanding.
6. The carefully prepared and structured lesson is only a small part of what is going on in a classroom; and not the most important part.
7. Form is more important than content.
8. What you are is more important than what you say.
9. Learning takes confidence in our capacity to learn; we need all the encouragement we can get.
10. Fixing kills. Life needs to breath.

Belong or become?

August 7, 2007

Eventually politics, history and schooling are about power in Foucault’s sense; systems of thought which become controlling, socially legitimized and institutionalized.
Power and fear too easily become the dominant elements in motivation and control; the need to belong, to have our thoughts ratified, to survive in a social context of the group.
Those well-placed try to maintain the system; those handicapped or victimized by that system either try to overthrow the existing structure for one where they are empowered or they create personal identities or subcultures which give them their own identity.
Our lives are caught in the dialectical impulses of individual and social need; between conformity and self-development. Ironically, it is usually the social deviant; the shaman or the artist, that create the catalyst for progress and change.
It is those without imagination that most fear change and wish, at all cost, to limit things to the parameters of their vision and to keep things thus.
Let us never lose sight of humanity; the ability to laugh, to love and to forgive the subjectivity and frailty of our very nature.
Let us allow people to fulfil their potential and not hem them in with regulations and procedures.
Let us never put systems before people and always remember, “All dharma is a dream”.

On time and satisfaction

August 3, 2007

Today three separate teachers talked to be of the incapacity of students to ‘engage’ information; their lack of concentration – their dispersion.
We are drowning, as Neil Postman foresaw, in information – in fact we are not drowning at all; it is a frozen surface over which we skate, moving fast from one thing to another. We are encouraged to be passive consumers, not user.
I teach drawing, I teach Art History. For both of these activities one must stop and look, and look for a long time. It takes work and effort.
Satisfaction comes from work and effort, not easy consumption. Quality arises out of sincerity and the total absorption of the self with what one is doing (this is probably one of the reasons that the work of children often shows so much quality). It also comes from setting oneself the highest standards and caring about detail.
Absorption is the mark of concentration and concentration is the secret of achieving resonance of depth in what you do. The inability to concentrate for an extended time is the biggest single problem that I encounter as a teacher.

It is not the student’s fault; it is a problem of our society. We live in the age of instantaneous fulfillment; I read that the average concentration span for television is down to ten seconds and constant newness replaces extended pleasure- the momentary zap of the ‘fast food burger” instead of the subtle and slowly orchestrated pleasure of the slow, social dinner.

Newness and youth are more valued than perfection and maturity; the arrogance of the modernist belief that history no longer has a place.

Subtlety is replaced with novel variety. Satisfaction is the promise of what comes next; the free give-away offered when one buys the next product. The result is a general malaise in our society and nobody quite understands why.

Yet all that is lasting in value and pleasure requires involvement, effort and a slow revealing; patience. Satisfaction is a product of effort. The human orgasm is a brief and hardly satisfactory affair in itself. Its potency comes from it being the culmination of a wonderfully complex physical, psychological and emotional dance that might begin with a glance across a crowded room. When people began to fix the responsibility for too many things on the brief physical pleasure itself, as in the sixties anxiety tended to follow.

To understand a picture, to discover a human being, to enjoy a poem or a piece of music takes time and focus. To a certain extent it takes the laying down of one’s own ego to appreciate a new perspective. There is a certain amount of giving up; you only get what you give. Take type form: to develop the experience to understand subtle differences takes time to develop a discrimination, it takes knowledge of the development and history. It takes experience and usage.

Looking is a slow and sensuous business; the longer you look the more you see and the more capable you become of seeing. Cézanne found a lifetime’s looking in a handful of apples. Ah, but there is so much to see! So much to learn, so much information. Survival requires us to be mental jugglers; to assimilate and to pass on to the next thing:

“The supposed great misery of our century is the lack of time; our sense of that, not a disinterested love of science, and certainly not wisdom, is why we devote such a huge proportion of the ingenuity and income of our society to finding faster ways of doing things- as if the final aim of mankind was not to grow closer to a perfect humanity, but to a perfect lightening-flash”
John Fowles

Individual v. the social

August 3, 2007

What has all this to do with education? The problem that remains with me is the finding the balance between understanding and imposition. To what point is my role as an educator is socialisation, the imposition of an existing set of values and world picture and to what point the cultivation and nurturing of an individual spirit? where do I understand and where do I impose?
To what point is school about socialization and to what point about individual growth?